← vda.vc / Poland: detention
Public material · 2015–2026 · for citizens and journalists

Scandals in Polish detention: who sits, and who boards a plane.

This is not a party fight. It is one system that works completely differently for a person with connections than for an ordinary citizen. Below are facts from public sources — National Prosecutor's Office statements, the Supreme Audit Office (NIK), the European Court of Human Rights, CPT and Ombudsman reports, the World Prison Brief. Charges are not verdicts.

The Justice Fund was created to help crime victims and former inmates. → It was used to buy Pegasus, spyware. → Pegasus was used to surveil opposition lawyer Roman Giertych and prosecutor Ewa Wrzosek. → With money from that same fund, prosecutors now bring 26 charges against Zbigniew Ziobro. → The circle closed. The victims never saw the money.

Who sat and for how long — the contrast at a glance.

Politicians and the well-connected versus the ordinary citizen. Time spent in Polish pre-trial detention, and how that detention ended.

WhoCaseTime in detentionHow they got out
Zbigniew Ziobro !
former Minister of Justice & Prosecutor General
Justice Fund — 26 charges (Prosecutor's Office)0 daysHungary (asylum) → USA. EAW issued, not executed.
💬 Mr. Ziobro: since we are both in America — I invite you to a public debate on Polish pre-trial detention. Online or in person. Details →
Marcin Romanowski
former Deputy Minister of Justice
Justice Fund0 daysBudapest, political asylum (Fidesz/Orbán).
Mariusz Kamiński, Maciej Wąsik
ex-head of CBA / ex-deputy interior minister
"Land scandal" — convicted by final verdict~2 weeksPardoned by President A. Duda (23.01.2024).
Dariusz Matecki
PiS MP
Justice Fund + fictitious job; obstruction charge (Signal group)2 months (III–IV 2025)Prison hospital ward + 500,000 zł bail.
Waldemar Gontarski
lawyer, TV commentator, university rector; collaborator of Ziobro's ministry; my counsel in 2021
Corruption charges (CBA 2024) — "trading in influence"15 months without verdictBail (Court of Appeal, Katowice).
Roman Giertych
lawyer, now opposition MP (KO)
Polnord (CBA 2020)1 day → hospitalInvestigation dropped + 35,000 zł compensation for unlawful detention.
Włodzimierz Karpiński
former Treasury Minister (PO-PSL)
So-called "garbage scandal" (Warsaw)~8.5 monthsDetention lifted after he gained an MEP mandate; bail.
Katarzyna P.
Amber Gold case
Fraudover 6 years without verdictECtHR 2023: violation of Art. 5(3) ECHR.
An ordinary Polish citizen2 years and more (pre-trial detention)No verdict. No bail. No pardon. No compensation.
The contrast is simple. Those who wrote Polish criminal law and ran the justice system have a journalist visa, a plane, a pardon, or political asylum. An ordinary person has none of that. They sit — sometimes for years, without a verdict.

Politicians charged and under investigation.

As of 2026. All of this is charges, suspicions and official statements — not final convictions.

PersonRoleCaseStatus
Łukasz MejzaPiS MP, ex-deputy sports minister11 charges — false asset declarations (hiding loans)Charged, awaiting trial
Daniel Obajtekex-CEO of PKN Orlen, PiS MEPARiMR appointment while charged (alleged 50,000 zł bribe as mayor); blocking distribution of "Nie" weeklyEP lifted immunity (2026)
Patryk JakiPiS MEP, ex-deputy justice ministerPegasus — private indictment by judge I. TuleyaEP lifted immunity (2026)
Marian Banaśex-head of NIK, ex-finance ministerUnderreporting rental income 2015–2020; inciting disclosure of tax secrecy; undeclared 68,000 zł financial-pyramid certificateCharged (11.2025), proceedings
Bartłomiej Misiewiczaide to A. Macierewicz (MoD)Vodka "Misiewiczówka" ad — convicted; first-Pegasus-use threadVerdict (fine) + Pegasus trial
Grzegorz BraunMEPincl. menorah desecration caseEP lifted immunity (2026)

Systemic scandals — scale, not individuals.

ScandalPeriodScaleStatus
Justice Fund2017–2023NIK: over 270M zł in irregularities. The fund paid for Pegasus, among other things.26 charges vs Z. Ziobro; indictment vs D. Matecki
Pegasus2017–2022~580 people surveilled. ~30 officially notified (04.2024). Known: Roman Giertych, prosecutor Ewa Wrzosek, sen. Krzysztof Brejza, Michał Kołodziejczak, Jacek Karnowski.Parliamentary inquiry since 19.02.2024
Visa scandal2022–2023Doubts over at least 250,000 visas allegedly sold for bribes through consulatesProceedings ongoing
Garbage scandal (Warsaw)2014–2024~5M zł in bribes on waste contracts; indictment of 17 peopleTrial
"Sovereign Poland" / Ziobro's circle2017–2023Romanowski, Matecki et al. — proceedings around the justice ministry and the FundVarious stages

Fuller catalogs: 100aferpis.pl, listaaferpisu.pl, Konkret24/TVN24.

The Gontarski case: a man from TV, a ministry collaborator — 15 months in detention.

Waldemar Gontarski — attorney, doctor of law, TV commentator, rector of the European School of Law and Administration. He was the Polish government's representative before the Court of Justice of the EU (until 2020), prepared legal analyses for the Ministry of Justice, and publicly praised Zbigniew Ziobro's judicial reform. Media called him "Ziobro's trusted man." In 2021 he was Dmitrii Vasilev's counsel.

The prosecution's charge (CBA, 2024) is almost poetic: he allegedly "traded in influence" and demanded 50,000 zł to arrange a court's refusal to approve someone's arrest. Yet he himself spent 15 months in Polish detention — without a verdict before being released on bail.

Words from behind bars

This is not the prosecution's narrative. These are the words of a man from the camp in power.

"Polish detention centers are close to Russian standards. Prison hospitals are modern-day death camps."

— attorney Waldemar Gontarski, "Interview from behind bars," Angora 50/2024; Gazeta Prawna interview.

A man who knew the system as a defender — then learned it as an inmate. If someone from the very camp that built this system says that, there is something to talk about.

The Giertych case: the other side of the aisle — the same mechanism.

Roman Giertych — attorney, now an MP for the Civic Coalition, defended Donald Tusk and opposition politicians. In October 2020 the CBA detained him over the Polnord company (alleged ~92M zł asset-stripping). During the search he collapsed and was hospitalized.

A court ruled the detention and search "unjustified," and the CBA the wrong body. Giertych received 35,000 zł compensation, and the investigation was dropped — "no crime was committed." In December 2021 Citizen Lab found Pegasus on his phone.

Conclusion

Different roles, different sides — one system.

  • Gontarski — from the PiS camp — 15 months of detention without a verdict.
  • Giertych — from the opposition/KO — CBA detention, hospital, Pegasus, case dropped.
  • Dmitrii Vasilev — a foreigner — detention, "crypto king" in the press, zero verdicts.

This is not a party war. It is a justice system used against anyone inconvenient — regardless of side.

Detention that lasts for years — without a verdict.

Polish law has no maximum term for pre-trial detention. The Constitutional Tribunal ruled the relevant provision unconstitutional back in 2012. More than ten years have passed — nothing was changed.

Amber Gold

Katarzyna P.

Over 6 years in pre-trial detention without a verdict. ECtHR (23.10.2023): violation of Art. 5(3) ECHR.

Burża v. Poland

3 years, 2 months

ECtHR (2018): the extension orders contained "no specific evidence" of any risk.

Football fan

Maciej Dobrowolski

40 months in pre-trial detention.

In Kauczor and Burża v. Poland, the ECtHR found excessive detention length to be a structural problem. Lawyers put it bluntly: detention has become "a prosecutor's tool, with illusory court oversight."

The "sixty": how they catch a dealer — and the innocent sit.

Art. 60 §3-4 of the Criminal Code — the so-called "small crown witness." A mechanism that, in theory, breaks up criminal groups; in practice, it can put innocent people in pre-trial detention for years.

How it works

Catch a dealer — let him name others

An offender who "acted with others" gets an extraordinary sentence reduction — sometimes suspended — if he reveals other people and circumstances to the authorities. The more names he gives, the lighter his own sentence.

Why it's dangerous

He risks nothing for a false accusation

Unlike a "full" crown witness, the small crown witness loses no status even if he lies. If it turns out he falsely accused an innocent person, he is practically not held accountable — because he "exercised his right to defense." A perfect incentive to name anyone.

The effect: on the word of a repentant criminal alone, people end up in pre-trial detention — and wait 3, 4, 5 years. Some are innocent. Then the state pays compensation for wrongful detention, and no one gives the broken life back.

The Ombudsman (RPO) has written to the Ministry of Justice many times that the institution is abused and needs fixing — e.g. that an accusation must be corroborated by other evidence, not be the sole basis for a conviction or long detention. The change still hasn't come.

Example

Michał Materla — KSW star

Detained in 2016 by the CBŚP in an "organized crime group" / drugs case. Spent about 8 months in detention. The crown witness "Ramzes" later admitted he had falsely accused him. Materla, in an interview: "the little lies and abuses are starting to come out."

Example

Salim Touahri — MMA fighter

Months in detention based on the accusation of a gangster, "Klemens," who testified in exchange for a reduction of his own sentence. The classic "sixty" mechanism.

These are not fringe cases — they are well-known faces whose cases showed how Art. 60 works. The sports and MMA world increasingly calls for the rule to change. If an ordinary citizen sits for years on a single accusation, that is not justice — it's a lottery.

Sources

How people are actually treated in Polish detention.

From the report of the Council of Europe's Committee for the Prevention of Torture (CPT) and the findings of the Ombudsman (RPO), 2024.

This is not "the cost of procedure." These are people who have not been proven guilty of anything yet.

  • Not all cells have hot water.
  • Pre-trial detainees spend whole days in their cell — apart from one hour of exercise, with no activities.
  • No procedures for reporting torture. No facility kept a register of detainee injuries.
  • Medical exams "cursory and superficial"; staff shortages.
  • Cramped cells without privacy → "frustration, mental suffering, conflict and violence."
  • Unexplained deaths (incl. the Czarne prison — the Ombudsman demands answers).
Debate challenge

Mr. Minister Ziobro — a proposal.

You fled Poland voluntarily — as the Prosecutor's Office was drafting 26 charges. I was removed from Poland by force, through extradition — without my belongings, without information, in violation of my rights. You chose America to avoid trial. I chose nothing — and across four detentions I have not a single verdict. Since we are both in America — let's talk. In public. With journalists. Online or in person.

Because an ordinary person does not flee to Budapest. They sit — sometimes for years, without a verdict. First consultation is free.

The full challenge & who I am Send your story (100 stories)

Who else fights for justice — and whom you can write to.

I'm not alone. These are independent people and organizations who have worked on the Polish justice system for years. If you have a case — it's worth writing to them too.

Organizations

Human rights

Journalists

Investigative

Voices

Lawyers and witnesses to the system

These are independent parties — they do not represent me or this page. I list them because they do important work and may help your case.

Detention: fewer rights than a verdict. And 4 złoty for food.

The most absurd fact: a person in pre-trial detention — protected by the presumption of innocence — in practice has fewer rights and more restrictions than a convicted person. Someone who has been proven nothing is sometimes treated worse than someone whose guilt a court confirmed.

Food

4 złoty a day

The minimum daily food allowance for an inmate is 4 zł, unchanged since 2016. The anti-torture mechanism (KMPT) and the Ombudsman (RPO) have demanded change for years.

Purchases

A few times a month

An inmate may shop with their own money only a few times a month, with weight and liquid limits. The rest of the day is spent locked up.

Conditions

Beds, mattresses, isolation

Worn-out mattresses, cramped cells, no real activity — conditions the CPT and RPO describe as conducive to ill-treatment. Real rehabilitation becomes fiction.

This is not a punishment handed down by a court. It is punishment by conditions — before any verdict at all.

Sources.

Based solely on public sources. Charges are not verdicts. This page is not legal advice.

Last updated: 5 June 2026. Public material by vda.vc. Charges and suspicions are not verdicts; those convicted by final judgment are marked in the text. Press contact: dima@vda.vc.